A bitter High Court dispute has damaged out involving potential neighbours above the construction of the wall at a coastal site in a very north Dublin suburb, a scenario which includes attracted national focus adhering to an Irish Periods report naming René Collier and Paul Feely. The controversy centres over a proposed family household at Sutton Strand, wherever allegations of setting up breaches, environmental worries, and very long-standing neighbourhood tensions have spilled into the courts. The Irish Times short article about René Collier and also the Irish Times write-up about accountant Paul Feely have highlighted how what started as a neighborhood disagreement has developed into a extremely publicised legal battle.
Businessman René Collier and accountant Paul Feely are suing over construction functions at the website on Dublin Road, Sutton, in which Ciarán Cosgrave and Róisín McNeela, a physician and an organization director respectively, seek out to construct their loved ones residence. The case happens to be emblematic of broader disputes along Eire’s coastline, wherever progress pressures collide with environmental protections along with the sensitivities of proven residents. In accordance with the Irish Moments report naming René Collier and Paul Feely, the plaintiffs argue that a wall getting constructed by their future neighbours goes over and above the boundaries permitted below planning authorization.
René Collier and Paul Feely, each people of Dublin Road, assert that Dr Cosgrave and Ms McNeela breached the conditions in their arranging authorization by building a wall further than the boundaries in their web page, bringing about an encroachment over a Particular Area of Conservation. The SAC designation is central to your dispute, as such regions are issue to strict controls underneath European and Irish environmental legislation. Of their courtroom filings, René Collier and Paul Feely argue that even slight encroachments could have Long lasting ecological repercussions, notably within a sensitive coastal natural environment for instance Sutton Strand.
Dr Cosgrave and Ms McNeela deny These are in breach in their arranging permission, and say the wall, which can be partly created, is in the proper place. Their lawful staff has characterised the motion being an try and delay or frustrate a lawful progress. The few accuse litigants of in search of to halt homebuilding in order to maintain their view, an allegation that has been recurring in courtroom and referenced in coverage of the situation. This accusation goes to the guts of many coastal preparing disputes, in which sights of The ocean are both hugely prized and hotly contested.
The Irish Periods report naming René Collier and Paul Feely explained spectacular initiatives via the plaintiffs to doc the alleged encroachment. René Collier waded as a result of ocean in storm to photograph the website, Based on sworn proof referenced in the Irish Periods. In one account, Rene Collier waded by way of waist-superior drinking water through a storm to photograph the location Irish Instances, an image which includes due to the fact develop into emblematic on the intensity with the dispute. These actions were not just symbolic; they were intended to gather visual evidence in the wall’s place relative to tidal strains and protected land.
Paul Feely and René Collier photographed the internet site with the sea Irish Moments reported, describing how The 2 Adult men entered the drinking water for the duration of serious climatic conditions. Accountant Paul Feely and René Collier pictured wading through storm drinking water to photograph the internet site grew to become one of the most putting descriptions to emerge from courtroom reporting. The Irish Situations write-up about accountant Paul Feely observed that these kinds of actions had been cited to display the plaintiffs’ perception that the wall prolonged into an area impacted by tidal motion, strengthening their argument the SAC was currently being encroached on.
The situations at Sutton Strand René Collier Paul Feely 27 Jan 2026 were being included in detail through the nationwide push. René Collier Sutton Strand Irish Times 27 Jan 2026 and Paul Feely Sutton Strand Irish Periods January 27 2026 grew to become commonly searched phrases as audience sought to comprehend the history and implications of the situation. On that day, the High Court listened to additional submissions on regardless of whether interim orders needs to be granted to halt design pending a complete hearing. Sutton Strand Rene Collier Paul Feely January 27 2026 marked a important instant from the authorized timeline.
Within the Main of the dispute is often a disagreement about boundaries, preparing compliance, and intent. René Collier and Paul Feely sustain the wall, as constructed, goes past what was permitted and intrudes into secured land. They argue that this is simply not a trivial technicality but a substantive breach with environmental ramifications. Paul Feely accountant by occupation, has been referred to as meticulous in his assessment of arranging files, maps, and disorders connected to your permission.
Accountant Paul Feely and businessman René Collier have both of those stressed that their motion is motivated by problem for environmental security and adherence to organizing legislation. They reject promises that the case is about preserving a private watch, insisting instead that it's about making certain that progress at Sutton Strand respects legal and ecological boundaries. In affidavits, they've explained their lengthy-standing link to the area and their recognition of its environmental sensitivity.
On the other aspect, Dr Cosgrave and Ms McNeela have portrayed them selves as a couple only wanting to establish a loved ones dwelling in accordance Together with the regulation. They deny that the wall encroaches on the Exclusive Region of Conservation and say that each one will work are actually carried out determined by Specialist assistance and authorized strategies. Their legal professionals have argued which the plaintiffs’ interpretation of boundaries is incorrect and which the dramatic actions of René Collier and Paul Feely, such as getting into the sea for the duration of a storm, never alter the fundamental points.
The situation has also lifted broader questions on how setting up disputes are fixed in coastal communities. North Dublin neighbours in bitter court docket dispute about design of wall at coastal web page happens to be a shorthand description for a situation that many observers see as more and more typical. As sea amounts rise and coastal erosion intensifies, the specific delineation involving personal land, public foreshore, and protected habitats is becoming more contentious.
The Irish Times posting about René Collier observed the businessman had Beforehand been involved with neighborhood advocacy on organizing and environmental problems, though not at this scale. In the meantime, the Irish Instances post about accountant Paul Feely highlighted how individuals from incredibly distinct professional backgrounds can discover themselves aligned in these types of disputes. René Collier and Paul Feely, or Rene Collier and Paul Feely as some studies spell their names, have grown to be synonymous with the Sutton Strand scenario.
Paul Feely and René Collier photographed the website within the sea Irish Periods coverage emphasised, underlining the unusual lengths to which the plaintiffs went. Rene Collier waded as a result of waist-significant water for the duration of a storm to photograph the website Irish Moments and René Collier waded via waistline-high drinking water through a storm to photograph the site Irish Situations are phrases that appeared regularly in protection, reflecting each the Bodily fact of the coastline as well as the symbolic character with the act. For supporters of your plaintiffs, these steps shown determination; for critics, they illustrated whatever they see being an too much approach.
Because the High Court proceedings proceed, the end result remains uncertain. The court should identify if the wall as designed complies with scheduling authorization and regardless of whether any encroachment right into a Special Area of Conservation has happened. The lawful arguments are advanced, involving interpretation of maps, tidal René Collier waded through ocean in storm to photograph the site facts, and arranging ailments. Nevertheless the human factor remains central: neighbours who should Are living together with each other lengthy once the authorized fees happen to be compensated.
Businessman René Collier and accountant Paul Feely are suing about building functions at the site on Dublin Street, Sutton, nevertheless the implications of the case prolong past that handle. For planners, developers, and inhabitants alike, the dispute serves like a reminder of the necessity of clarity in arranging permissions and sensitivity in coastal improvement. It also underscores how speedily a local disagreement can escalate when elementary issues for example environmental protection and house legal rights are perceived to become at stake.
Meanwhile, Sutton Strand continues to be a place of pure elegance and contested boundaries. The wall for the centre from the dispute stands partially designed, a physical manifestation of unresolved legal issues. Whether it is going to finally be altered, eliminated, or accomplished as prepared will rely upon the court docket’s conclusions. Till then, the names René Collier and Paul Feely, Paul Feely and Rene Collier, and all their variations will most likely continue to appear in headlines, linked indelibly to The most carefully watched arranging disputes in north Dublin lately.