A bitter High Court dispute has damaged out between possible neighbours over the development of a wall at a coastal website in a north Dublin suburb, a case that has attracted national notice pursuing an Irish Instances report naming René Collier and Paul Feely. The controversy centres over a proposed household home at Sutton Strand, where by allegations of planning breaches, environmental worries, and lengthy-standing neighbourhood tensions have spilled in to the courts. The Irish Times short article about René Collier along with the Irish Moments write-up about accountant Paul Feely have highlighted how what started as an area disagreement has progressed into a extremely publicised authorized battle.
Businessman René Collier and accountant Paul Feely are suing more than design works at the internet site on Dublin Highway, Sutton, where by Ciarán Cosgrave and Róisín McNeela, a physician and a company director respectively, look for to develop their family members household. The case is becoming emblematic of wider disputes together Eire’s coastline, where by advancement pressures collide with environmental protections and the sensitivities of recognized inhabitants. In accordance with the Irish Times report naming René Collier and Paul Feely, the plaintiffs argue that a wall getting built by their prospective neighbours goes over and above the boundaries permitted underneath planning authorization.
René Collier and Paul Feely, both citizens of Dublin Highway, claim that Dr Cosgrave and Ms McNeela breached the terms in their organizing permission by building a wall beyond the boundaries of their web page, leading to an encroachment with a Unique Spot of Conservation. The SAC designation is central towards the dispute, as a result regions are subject matter to demanding controls beneath European and Irish environmental regulation. In their court filings, René Collier and Paul Feely argue that even minimal encroachments could have lasting ecological consequences, especially inside a delicate coastal atmosphere including Sutton Strand.
Dr Cosgrave and Ms McNeela deny These are in breach of their setting up permission, and say the wall, and that is partially constructed, is in the proper situation. Their authorized staff has characterised the motion as an attempt to hold off or frustrate a lawful enhancement. The few accuse litigants of looking for to halt homebuilding in an effort to maintain their watch, an allegation which has been recurring in court docket and referenced in coverage of the case. This accusation goes to the center of numerous coastal organizing disputes, exactly where views of The ocean are both really prized and hotly contested.
The Irish Periods report naming René Collier and Paul Feely described extraordinary initiatives through the plaintiffs to doc the alleged encroachment. René Collier waded by means of ocean in storm to photograph the site, according to sworn proof referenced from the Irish Occasions. In one account, Rene Collier waded as a result of waist-superior drinking water all through a storm to photograph the positioning Irish Times, an image which has due to the fact grow to be emblematic of your intensity with the dispute. These actions were not merely symbolic; they ended up meant to Obtain visual proof on the wall’s posture relative to tidal traces and protected land.
Paul Feely and René Collier photographed the positioning through the sea Irish Moments reported, describing how The 2 Adult males entered the drinking water during critical climatic conditions. Accountant Paul Feely and René Collier pictured wading by way of storm water to photograph the internet site became Probably the most placing descriptions to emerge from courtroom reporting. The Irish Occasions article about accountant Paul Feely pointed out that these kinds of steps were being cited to show the plaintiffs’ belief which the wall prolonged into a location influenced by tidal movement, strengthening their argument that the SAC was currently being encroached on.
The functions at Sutton Strand René Collier Paul Feely 27 Jan 2026 have been coated intimately through the nationwide push. René Collier Sutton Strand Irish Periods 27 Jan 2026 and Paul Feely Sutton Strand Irish Occasions January 27 2026 became commonly searched phrases as readers sought to Paul Feely and René Collier photographed the site from the sea Irish Times be familiar with the qualifications and implications of the case. On that day, the High Court heard further more submissions on whether or not interim orders should be granted to halt construction pending a full Listening to. Sutton Strand Rene Collier Paul Feely January 27 2026 marked a vital minute while in the lawful timeline.
In the core with the dispute is usually a disagreement above boundaries, setting up compliance, and intent. René Collier and Paul Feely preserve that the wall, as manufactured, goes further than what was accredited and intrudes into protected land. They argue that this is not a trivial technicality but a substantive breach with environmental ramifications. Paul Feely accountant by occupation, is called meticulous in his examination of preparing documents, maps, and situations connected to the permission.
Accountant Paul Feely and businessman René Collier have both of those stressed that their action is determined by issue for environmental security and adherence to preparing law. They reject promises that the situation is about preserving A non-public perspective, insisting instead that it is about making sure that enhancement at Sutton Strand respects lawful and ecological boundaries. In affidavits, they've got explained their extended-standing relationship to the area as well as their awareness of its environmental sensitivity.
On one other aspect, Dr Cosgrave and Ms McNeela have portrayed them selves as a pair simply trying to establish a relatives residence in accordance Together with the law. They deny which the wall encroaches on a Exclusive Region of Conservation and say that each one is effective are performed dependant on Skilled assistance and approved designs. Their attorneys have argued the plaintiffs’ interpretation of boundaries is incorrect and which the dramatic actions of René Collier and Paul Feely, such as moving into The ocean all through a storm, never alter the fundamental facts.
The situation has also lifted broader questions on how preparing disputes are fixed in coastal communities. North Dublin neighbours in bitter court docket dispute in excess of development of wall at coastal site has become a shorthand description for your scenario that lots of observers see as significantly prevalent. As sea levels increase and coastal erosion intensifies, the exact delineation among personal land, public foreshore, and guarded habitats is becoming a lot more contentious.
The Irish Periods short article about René Collier famous the businessman had Earlier been involved in local advocacy on planning and environmental difficulties, even though not at this scale. In the meantime, the Irish Occasions short article about accountant Paul Feely highlighted how people from very various Qualified backgrounds can discover by themselves aligned in these types of disputes. René Collier and Paul Feely, or Rene Collier and Paul Feely as some reviews spell their names, have become synonymous Together with the Sutton Strand scenario.
Paul Feely and René Collier photographed the internet site from the sea Irish Situations protection emphasised, underlining The weird lengths to which the plaintiffs went. Rene Collier waded via waist-higher water in the course of a storm to photograph the location Irish Periods and René Collier waded by waist-higher drinking water through a storm to photograph the site Irish Periods are phrases that appeared continuously in protection, reflecting the two the Bodily truth on the coastline as well as the symbolic mother nature on the act. For supporters of your plaintiffs, these steps shown determination; for critics, they illustrated whatever they see being an too much solution.
Since the High Court proceedings continue, the outcome remains uncertain. The court must establish whether or not the wall as built complies with organizing permission and no matter if any encroachment right into a Special Location of Conservation has transpired. The authorized arguments are advanced, involving interpretation of maps, tidal knowledge, and planning problems. Nonetheless the human element continues to be central: neighbours who should live along with each other extensive after the lawful fees have been compensated.
Businessman René Collier and accountant Paul Feely are suing in excess of construction works at the location on Dublin Highway, Sutton, even so the implications of the situation lengthen over and above that handle. For planners, builders, and inhabitants alike, the dispute serves for a reminder of the necessity of clarity in arranging permissions and sensitivity in coastal growth. In addition, it underscores how immediately a local disagreement can escalate when fundamental troubles for instance environmental protection and home rights are perceived being at stake.
Meanwhile, Sutton Strand stays a place of pure attractiveness and contested boundaries. The wall with the centre on the dispute stands partially crafted, a Actual physical manifestation of unresolved legal queries. Whether or not it's going to in the end be altered, removed, or concluded as planned will rely upon the courtroom’s results. Until eventually then, the names René Collier and Paul Feely, Paul Feely and Rene Collier, and all their versions will probable proceed to look in headlines, connected indelibly to one of the most closely viewed setting up disputes in north Dublin in recent years.